Bills Sponsored:

Gary Palmer in his own words:

‍ ‍On his website, Gary Palmer lists his priorities as: religious freedom, energy & environment, veterans, defense, budget, immigration, economic growth, second amendment, tax reform, right to life, health care, and national debt. One huge thing I will give him credit for is that he does not mention Trump a single time on his website. Good for him for taking a hint! I don’t care for his statement on immigration, wherein “he has formally pledged to oppose legislation that would grant work authorization or legal status to illegal immigrants”. According to the Center for American Progress, “immigration is the driving force behind America’s labor supply growth… large-scale removal of immigrant workers from the economy…result[s] in wage declines that are more than twice as large as any short-term gains… The broader macroeconomic impact of these policies - including lost business revenue, increased rent assistance needs, and heightened food insecurity - cost [Minneapolis] at least $203 million in January alone”. His pledge also ignores the fact that in order to even apply for U.S. citizenship, you have to have already lived in the U.S. for around 5 years. In order to get a green card, which would designate you as a lawful permanent resident, you have to be eligible, which means you need to be related to someone with a green card, invest $1.05 million into a new commercial enterprise, achieve special immigrant status, be a refugee or asylum seeker, be a victim of human trafficking or abuse, or have lived in the U.S. continuously since 1972. This, in my opinion, seems to be a case of Over-Engineering. The process is so complex it’s literally easier to just come to the U.S. illegally and try to become a legal resident with help from people who understand the system better. This isn’t an issue of illegal immigrants being bad evil people, it’s a management and design issue.

Gary Palmer in the bills he’s sponsored:

Gary Palmer vaguely styles himself on his website as a conservative who supports conservative leadership, and while I don’t disagree, he seems a lot more mild and therefore palatable than many of the other Republicans I’ve covered on this website so far. In fact, his first bill of 2025 was to give a Congressional Gold Medal to the 761st Tank Battalion for their role as the first Black soldiers to go to war as an American armored unit. A lot of his bills are solely focused on efficiency, both within the government’s spending and also in regards to reusing and recycling critical mineral resources (even if doing so would increase pollution). I feel that he’s actually the type of person Republicans claim they are when the rest of their viewpoints prove indefensible. He’s sponsored a Citizen Ballot Protection Act, which would permit states to require proof of citizenship in their mail ballot applications. It doesn’t particularly define what would qualify as proof of citizenship in this scenario, but typically that means a birth certificate, a REAL ID, or a passport which many people don’t have. This bill would restrict voting rights for disabled people who don’t have access to those things, but compared to many of the ballot acts other Republicans have proposed it’s relatively mild and would depend on the state that takes advantage of this permission. All that being said, he’s not my ideal politician but I don’t hate this guy. I think he means well.

His potential successor:

Gary Palmer is currently running against Maurice Mercer. Maurice Mercer lists his priorities as: lower costs for working families, healthcare that works for families and small businesses, family, faith, and life, education, unions, and workforce development, small business growth, public safety with accountability, infrastructure people can see, fair maps and less partisan blame, immigration reform, border security with respect to constitutional rights and due process, and leadership that puts people over politics. Maurice’s website gives him the appearance of a “common sense Democrat”; someone who recognizes the fears of both sides and wants to serve people overall. That may be what he needs to do in order to win, but it also makes me worry he will be another “do-nothing Democrat”; someone who only talks and doesn’t provide any true solutions. I think it’s important to consider both sides of an argument before intervening, but in a nation where one of the two parties bases all of their arguments and political takes on reacting violently to information and scenarios that they made up, and the other side writes strongly worded letters about it and allows the initial side to make crazy, unsupported claims without holding them to account, I’m less than confident that centrism and just asking everybody to be nice is going to fix anything. It’s hard to reach an agreement with someone when there’s such a huge discrepancy in the fundamental “facts” that your opinions are based in.